Telecom software development services
OSS and BSS work, billing pipelines and subscriber apps, built by senior LATAM engineers who work your hours and understand what a billing run costs when it goes wrong.






-
15+years delivering software
-
100+senior engineers across LATAM
-
6-8hdaily overlap with US teams
-
6+Fortune 500 & global brands trust us
Engineers who have worked on a live carrier stack
Telecom software is judged on two numbers: whether the bill is right and whether the service activated. Everything else is a feature request that can wait until the next release.
FusionHit builds around carrier and MVNO systems with senior engineers across Latin America who have worked with rating and CDR pipelines, provisioning flows and vendor platforms that stopped being configurable years ago. They work US Central and Eastern hours, so a failed billing run or a provisioning backlog gets attention the morning it happens.
\ Telecom systems we build
The work carriers, MVNOs and telecom software companies bring us most often.
Billing, rating and charging
Rating logic, invoicing, disputes and the reconciliation that decides whether revenue leaks quietly every month.
CDR and mediation pipelines
Collecting, normalizing and reprocessing usage records at the volume you actually run, with a way to replay a bad day.
Order to activate
Order capture, service qualification, provisioning and the fallout queue where the real cost of a broken flow shows up.
Network inventory and assurance
Inventory, fault and performance data turned into something an operations team can work from.
Subscriber apps and self-service
Account, usage, payments and plan changes, so routine work stops arriving at the call center.
MVNO enablement
The systems an MVNO needs around a host network agreement, from onboarding to wholesale reconciliation.
Integration around vendor platforms
Building beside a BSS or OSS platform that has reached its configuration limits, without forking it.
Legacy migration
Moving off a platform or an in-house system while subscribers, balances and history stay intact.
The operators and vendors we work with
Different scale, different constraints. These are the ones our engineers already know how to work with.
Carriers and CSPs
Work around a vendor BSS or OSS stack, at a volume where a bad release is measured in subscribers.
MVNOs
Everything the host network does not give you, from onboarding to reconciliation against wholesale.
Regional carriers and co-ops
Smaller teams carrying the same regulatory and billing obligations as a national operator.
ISPs, fiber and cable
Provisioning, field operations and the customer experience around a physical network.
Enterprise communications
Voice, messaging and collaboration platforms sold to business customers.
Telecom software vendors
Product companies that need senior engineering capacity on a roadmap their customers depend on.
What working on a carrier stack actually involves
Every vendor lists OSS and BSS as two bullet points. This is what the work behind them actually looks like.
Rating, invoicing, adjustments and the cycle that has to close on time every month.
Reprocessing and replay for a bad cycle, a test environment with realistic volume, and a change process that never ships rating logic without a parallel run against real data.
Collecting and normalizing usage from network elements and partners before anything gets rated.
Handling late, duplicate and malformed records as normal cases rather than incidents, plus reconciliation that proves nothing was dropped between collection and billing.
Everything between a signed order and a working service.
Service qualification, provisioning across systems that fail differently, and a fallout queue someone can actually work. Most of the cost sits in the exceptions, not the happy path.
A common interface shape for product, order, service and billing, so integrations survive the next vendor change.
Adopting the API patterns where they fit rather than as a certification exercise, and mapping your existing model to them once instead of per project.
Number portability, E911 and NG911 records, CPNI handling, STIR/SHAKEN and the reporting your regulator expects.
Treating them as product requirements with tests and evidence, not as a compliance document written after launch.
Moving subscribers, balances and history without a billing surprise.
Running the new system in parallel for full cycles, migrating in waves, and keeping a way back until the numbers match on both sides.
The billing run
Rating, invoicing, adjustments and the cycle that has to close on time every month.
Reprocessing and replay for a bad cycle, a test environment with realistic volume, and a change process that never ships rating logic without a parallel run against real data.
CDR and mediation
Collecting and normalizing usage from network elements and partners before anything gets rated.
Handling late, duplicate and malformed records as normal cases rather than incidents, plus reconciliation that proves nothing was dropped between collection and billing.
Order to activate
Everything between a signed order and a working service.
Service qualification, provisioning across systems that fail differently, and a fallout queue someone can actually work. Most of the cost sits in the exceptions, not the happy path.
TM Forum Open APIs
A common interface shape for product, order, service and billing, so integrations survive the next vendor change.
Adopting the API patterns where they fit rather than as a certification exercise, and mapping your existing model to them once instead of per project.
US regulatory obligations
Number portability, E911 and NG911 records, CPNI handling, STIR/SHAKEN and the reporting your regulator expects.
Treating them as product requirements with tests and evidence, not as a compliance document written after launch.
Migrating off a vendor platform
Moving subscribers, balances and history without a billing surprise.
Running the new system in parallel for full cycles, migrating in waves, and keeping a way back until the numbers match on both sides.
How a telecom build runs
Discovery
The systems, the volumes and the exceptions that consume your team, turned into a scope with acceptance criteria.
Architecture and integration design
Where the new work sits against your platforms, and how data flows without duplicating the source of truth.
Build
Sprints with a demo every week, in repositories under your organization.
Testing and acceptance
Automated tests, parallel runs against real volume for anything touching billing, and your own acceptance.
Launch and support
Cutover planned around your billing cycle, then a support window written into the agreement.
What it takes to build, by system
Vendors answer this with 'it depends'. Here is what it depends on, by the kind of system, so you arrive at the first call knowing what to expect.
3-5 months
Systems it reads from, payments, plan change rules, and how much of the account model is exposed by your platform.
3-5 months
Number of systems, what the platform exposes, and how much logic has to be rebuilt outside it.
4-7 months
Record volume and formats, number of sources, reprocessing requirements, and reconciliation depth.
5-9 months
Product catalogue complexity, promotions and discounts, tax, and how many cycles have to run in parallel before cutover.
5-9 months
Systems in the chain, how each one fails, and how much of the fallout handling exists today.
8-14 months
Subscriber count, history and balances, parallel run length, and how far the current system has drifted from its documentation.
Subscriber app or self-service portal
3-5 months
Systems it reads from, payments, plan change rules, and how much of the account model is exposed by your platform.
Integration layer around a vendor platform
3-5 months
Number of systems, what the platform exposes, and how much logic has to be rebuilt outside it.
CDR and mediation pipeline
4-7 months
Record volume and formats, number of sources, reprocessing requirements, and reconciliation depth.
Billing or rating work
5-9 months
Product catalogue complexity, promotions and discounts, tax, and how many cycles have to run in parallel before cutover.
Order to activate
5-9 months
Systems in the chain, how each one fails, and how much of the fallout handling exists today.
Platform migration
8-14 months
Subscriber count, history and balances, parallel run length, and how far the current system has drifted from its documentation.
Why operators build with FusionHit
-
On your cycle, not the next day
Engineers on US Central and Eastern time, so a failed run, a provisioning backlog or a partner file gets handled the morning it happens.
-
Senior engineering talent
Vetted nearshore engineers with production experience in billing, mediation and provisioning systems.
-
Careful with anything that touches revenue
Parallel runs, replay and reconciliation are part of the definition of done for billing work, not a phase that gets cut.
-
Integrated partnership
One delivery lead accountable to you, working in your tools and reporting in writing every week.

Platforms we have worked on
AI-Augmented Development and Operations in a Multi-Team Enterprise
Challenge Multiple engineering teams working across Supply Chain and Support Services were operating in silos, each dealing independently with challenges around…
Embedding AI Across the Full Engineering Lifecycle
Challenge A product engineering team was managing growing codebases with increasing complexity around quality control, documentation, and cloud infrastructure. Code reviews…
Closing the Mobile Platform Gap Through AI-Accelerated Development
Challenge A mobile product team was running two parallel codebases — iOS and Android — but iOS development was consistently falling…

Tell us which system your team keeps working around.
Talk to an expert, 30 minutes, no commitment.
Three ways to work with us
Pick the model that fits how your team runs. Plenty of clients start with one and move to another as the roadmap grows.
Staff augmentation
Senior engineers added to your existing team, under your direction. Best when you have a technical lead and need capacity or a specific skill.
Dedicated development teams
A stable team that works only on your product, with a lead on our side. Best when you want a whole workstream owned without hiring a manager for it.
Software development outsourcing
A defined scope delivered end to end under our management, for a fixed price and date. Best when the scope is clear and you want one number and one date.
Stacks our telecom teams work in
The technologies behind the systems we build and maintain around your network.
Other industries we build for
The same engineering standards, applied to the rules each industry runs under.
Energy
Grid, metering and field systems built with the same care as anything touching operations.
Fintech
Payments, lending, banking and wealth platforms built inside your compliance perimeter.
SaaS
Multi-tenant products, platform rebuilds and the engineering behind a growing subscription business.
Logistics
Systems that run around the clock, from warehouse to last mile.
Retail
Commerce and store platforms sized for a peak season before it arrives.
Insurance
Policy, quoting and claims platforms for carriers, MGAs and brokers.




